Estimasi Biaya Website UMKM Travel Menggunakan Metode FPA, UCP, dan Hybrid

Cellina Avrilia Angel; Renny Sari Dewi

doi:10.47134/jacis.v6i2.198

Authors

Cellina Avrilia Angel Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Renny Sari Dewi Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jacis.v6i2.198

Keywords:

estimasi biaya, Function Point Analysis, Use Case Points, Model Hybrid, Website UMKM

Abstract

Estimasi biaya yang tidak akurat pada tahap awal pengembangan perangkat lunak dapat menyebabkan pembengkakan anggaran, terutama bagi UMKM yang memiliki keterbatasan sumber daya. Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan performa metode Function Point Analysis (FPA), Use Case Points (UCP), dan Hybrid FPA-UCP dalam mengestimasi biaya pengembangan website UMKM Travel. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif komparatif berbasis studi kasus dengan mengonversi ukuran fungsional sistem menjadi effort dan biaya, kemudian membandingkannya dengan biaya aktual proyek. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa FPA menghasilkan estimasi biaya sebesar Rp16.195.220 dengan deviasi 9,52% (underestimate), sedangkan UCP menghasilkan estimasi Rp19.604.740 dengan deviasi 9,52% (overestimate). Model Hybrid FPA-UCP menghasilkan estimasi Rp17.900.000 dengan deviasi mendekati 0% terhadap biaya aktual. Pada studi kasus website UMKM Travel, pendekatan Hybrid FPA-UCP memberikan estimasi biaya yang paling mendekati biaya aktual dibandingkan FPA dan UCP. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan hybrid berpotensi menjadi alternatif estimasi biaya untuk proyek website UMKM dengan karakteristik serupa, meskipun masih memerlukan validasi pada lebih banyak proyek

References

[1] “The Standish Group, CHAOS Report 2020: Beyond Infinity. Boston, MA, USA: The Standish Group International, 2020.,” OpenCommons. Accessed: Jul. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://opencommons.org/File:Project-success-qrc-standish-group-chaos-report-2020.pdf

[2] A. D. P. Ariyanto, L. Azizah, and U. L. Yuhana, “Analisis Metode Estimasi Biaya pada Perangkat Lunak Beserta Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi : A Systematic Literature Review,” JTIIK, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 699–708, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.2021864611.

[3] antaranews.com, “Menteri Teten sebut 22,81 juta UMKM masuk ekosistem digital,” Antara News. Accessed: Jul. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.antaranews.com/berita/3710796/menteri-teten-sebut-2281-juta-umkm-masuk-ekosistem-digital

[4] R. S. Pressman and B. R. Maxim, Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach, Ninth edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education, 2020.

[5] P. Jayadi, Juwari, Muh.Nur Luthfi Azis, and K. Sussolaikah, “Estimasi Pengembangan Perangkat Lunak Dengan Use Case Size Point,” bit, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 332–340, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.47065/bit.v3i4.408.

[6] V. V. Hai, H. L. T. K. Nhung, Z. Prokopova, R. Silhavy, and P. Silhavy, “A New Approach to Calibrating Functional Complexity Weight in Software Development Effort Estimation,” Computers, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 15, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/computers11020015.

[7] E. Lumba, D. Widyaningrum, and A. Waworuntu, “Cost Estimation for Software Development Using Function Point Analysis Method,” International Journal of New Media Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 119–124, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.31937/ijnmt.v11i2.4006.

[8] Y. J. Kusumo, T. Rahmawati, I. G. W. Sena, A. Kristianto, and H. Andika, “Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Estimasi Biaya Proyek Perangkat Lunak Berbasis Function Point,” INSIGHT, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.37823/insight.v7i1.428.

[9] A. Sidqi, A. Yuswanto, and M. A. Yaqin, “Analisis Pengukuran Kompleksitas Website SOC Menggunakan Function Point,” jacis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 67–75, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.47134/jacis.v4i2.82.

[10] L. F. Mz, S. B, A. I. Rachman, A. Halid, G. Pratiwi, and S. Disa, “Enhancing Software Estimation: An Efficiency Improvement Model Using Word2Vec and Function Point Analysis,” IJCDS, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.12785/ijcds/1571136036.

[11] Ahmad Fauzan Haryono, Andria Farhan, Dewi Khairani, Supardi Razak, and Fitri Mintarsih, “Use Case Point Activity-Based Costing and Adjusted Function Point for Software Cost Estimation,” j. Teknik inform., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 310–326, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.15408/jti.v18i2.46669.

[12] P. Jayadi, R. S. Dewi, and K. Sussolaikah, “Activity-based function point complexity of use case diagrams for software effort estimation,” J. Soft Comput. Explor., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.52465/joscex.v5i1.252.

[13] A. Ardiansyah, M. I. Zulfa, A. Tarmuji, and F. H. Jabbar, “Optimization of use case point through the use of metaheuristic algorithm in estimating software effort,” Int. J. Adv. Intell. Informatics, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 109, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.26555/ijain.v10i1.1298.

[14] M. Imtiaz Malik, M. Azam Sindhu, and R. Ayaz Abbasi, “Extraction of use case diagram elements using natural language processing and network science,” PLoS ONE, vol. 18, no. 6, p. e0287502, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287502.

[15] M. Azzeh, A. Bou Nassif, and I. B. Attili, “Predicting software effort from use case points: A systematic review,” Science of Computer Programming, vol. 204, p. 102596, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scico.2020.102596.

[16] C. H. Rashid et al., “Software Cost and Effort Estimation: Current Approaches and Future Trends,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 99268–99288, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3312716.

[17] “Function Point Analysis (FPA),” International Function Point Users Group. Accessed: Jun. 16, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ifpug.org/ifpug-standards/fpa

[18] A. Anou, I. M. I. Subroto, and A. Marwanto, “Estimation Of Software Size Using Function Point Analysis On Inventory Information Systems,” Journal of Telematics and Informatics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 58–67, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.12928/jti.v9i2.

[19] P. Jayadi, A. C. Aria Bima, Y. P. Yudha, and Kelik Sussolaikah, “End User Development pada Use Case Point untuk peningkatan Estimasi Perangkat Lunak,” TEMATIK, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 74–82, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.38204/tematik.v10i1.1289.

[20] S. S. Ali, J. Ren, K. Zhang, J. Wu, and C. Liu, “Heterogeneous Ensemble Model to Optimize Software Effort Estimation Accuracy,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 27759–27792, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3256533.

[21] R. S. Dewi et al., “Conversion Model of Early COSMIC to Software Cost Estimation in Smart Health and Agriculture Applications,” IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 965–972, 2026.

[22] R. S. Dewi, R. Sarno, and E. S. Astuti, “A Risk-Integrated Perspective on the Influence of Technical and Environmental Complexity in Software Effort Estimation,” Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 30617–30623, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.48084/etasr.12404.