Pengaruh Automasi Verifikasi Identitas terhadap Waktu Penyelesaian Layanan dan Tingkat Kesalahan Transaksi: Studi Simulasi pada Proses Fulfillment

Syifa Fikroh Al Kaamil; Afaf Afaf; Muhammad Ainul Yaqin

doi:10.47134/jacis.v6i1.145

Authors

Syifa Fikroh Al Kaamil Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Afaf Afaf Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Muhammad Ainul Yaqin Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47134/jacis.v6i1.145

Keywords:

ERP, automasi verifikasi identitas, waktu layanan, tingkat kesalahan

Abstract

Transformasi digital dalam sistem Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) mendorong kebutuhan automasi proses bisnis, termasuk pada tahap fulfillment layanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh automasi verifikasi identitas terhadap waktu penyelesaian layanan dan tingkat kesalahan transaksi. Eksperimen simulatif dilakukan menggunakan dua dataset ERP, masing-masing berisi 100 transaksi pada mode manual dan otomatis, dengan parameter uji berupa waktu proses, jumlah kesalahan input, dan persentase verifikasi gagal. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan perbandingan komputasional antar-mode untuk menilai perubahan efisiensi proses. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa automasi verifikasi identitas mempercepat waktu penyelesaian sebesar 38% dan menurunkan tingkat kesalahan transaksi hingga 27%. Berbeda dari studi sebelumnya, penelitian ini menawarkan novelty berupa evaluasi empiris terhadap automasi verifikasi identitas berbasis lookup NIK dan nomor telepon dalam konteks proses fulfillment ERP menggunakan pendekatan Business Process Simulation (BPS). Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa digitalisasi verifikasi tidak hanya meningkatkan akurasi dan kecepatan, tetapi juga berpotensi diadaptasi oleh organisasi yang ingin meningkatkan efisiensi operasional melalui automasi proses layanan

References

[1] B. Alangot et al., “Decentralized Identity Authentication with Auditability and Privacy,” MDPI - Algorithms, vol. Desember, pp. 1–25, 2022, doi: 10.3390/a16010004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/a16010004

[2] S. Rane, Y. Wang, S. C. Draper, and P. Ishwar, “Secure Biometrics: Concepts, Authentication Architectures, and Challenges,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 51–64, 2013, doi: 10.1109/MSP.2013.2261691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2013.2261691

[3] A. Vaidya and A. Awasthi, “Zero-to-One IDV : A Conceptual Model for AI-Powered Identity Verification,” arXiv, vol. Maret, 2025, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.08734.

[4] J. Lai, T. Wang, S. Zhang, Q. Yang, and S. C. Liew, “BioZero : An Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Decentralized Biometric Authentication Protocol on Open Blockchain,” arXiv, vol. Septemebr, pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.17509.

[5] J. Su et al., “Large Language Models for Forecasting and Anomaly Detection: a Systematic Literature Review,” arXiv, vol. February, 2024, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.10350.

[6] B. Karamani, “Automation Of Data V Alidation Processes In Banking : a Case Study on Validating Albanian Identity,” SEEU, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 51–64, 2024, doi: 10.2478/seeur-2024-0022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2024-0022

[7] C. Wellmann, M. Stierle, S. Dunzer, and M. Martzner, “A framework to evaluate the viability of robotic process automation for business process activities,” arXiv, vol. September, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-58779-6 14. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58779-6

[8] K. Yuan, M. Gu, and Y. Hu, “Research on Digital Identity Authentication System based on Spark Blockchain,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Academic and Smart Finance Information Technology Conference on Blockchain, (ICBIS 2024), 2024, vol. 21, no. Icbis, pp. 240–247. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-419-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-419-8_30

[9] I. Adinoyi, A. Deborah, M. Olayinka, F. Hauwa, and O. Kolo, “AI- Powered Behavioural Biometrics for Fraud Detection in Digital Banking : A Next-Generation Approach to Financial Cybersecurity,” Asian J. Res. Comput. Sci., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 473–494, 2025, doi: 10.9734/ajrcos/2025/v18i4632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2025/v18i4632

[10] T. Berozashvili, “Securing Digital Identities In The Era Of Remote Identity Verification,” Res. Pap. ICS0029 Fundam. Res., pp. 1–21, 2024.

[11] U. P. Offiong, K. Szopik-Depczynska, K. Cheba, and G. Ioppolo, “FinTech as a digital innovation in microfinance companies – systematic literature review,” Eur. J. Manag., vol. 27, no. 9, 2024, doi: 10.1108/EJIM-04-2024-0462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2024-0462

[12] M. Jahangirian, T. Eldabi, A. Naseer, L. K. Stergioulas, and T. Young, “Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 203, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.06.004

[13] J. Hu, S. Member, G. Dai, L. Wang, L. Lai, and Y. Huang, “Adaptive Multi-Dimensional Parallel Fault Simulation Framework on Heterogeneous System,” IEEE Trans. Comput. Des. Integr. CIRCUITS Syst., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCAD.2022.3213617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCAD.2022.3213617

[14] R. R. Hill and R. R. Hill, “INFORMS Transactions on Education Process Simulation in Excel for a Quantitative Management Course,” Inf. Trans. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, 2002, doi: 10.1287/ited.2.3.75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2.3.75